<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More thoughts on E-Newspaper &amp; RSS Feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/03/more-thoughts-on-e-newspaper-rss-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/03/more-thoughts-on-e-newspaper-rss-feeds/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s that simple -- and that hard. And that inescapable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eoinpurcell</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/03/more-thoughts-on-e-newspaper-rss-feeds/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eoinpurcell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 21:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/2006/05/03/more-thoughts-on-e-newspaper-rss-feeds/#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that is a legitimate fear. Ultimately unless the aggregators share a slice of revenue they generate I think most media outlets will push for their own solution.

But from a consumer perspective I think most people would rather pick and choose their news sources on a single device. Comment from NYT, travel from the Chronicle, even access to a podcast they love or whatever.

It will be interesting to see what happens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is a legitimate fear. Ultimately unless the aggregators share a slice of revenue they generate I think most media outlets will push for their own solution.</p>
<p>But from a consumer perspective I think most people would rather pick and choose their news sources on a single device. Comment from NYT, travel from the Chronicle, even access to a podcast they love or whatever.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see what happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Sholin</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/03/more-thoughts-on-e-newspaper-rss-feeds/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Sholin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 17:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/2006/05/03/more-thoughts-on-e-newspaper-rss-feeds/#comment-9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Popurls, eh?  Interesting - my question is how news orgs will try to subvert the aggregators.  Keeping in mind, of course, that I want my aggregator.  The goofy MS/NYT reader thingie is a step in the wrong direction - proprietary.  Some of this depends on just how inexpensive the materials for our e-papers will be.  If the stuff is practically disposable, then you could buy a Times-branded reader one day and a Post-branded reader the next.  Not sure I like the sound of that, but it&#039;s a possibility.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popurls, eh?  Interesting &#8211; my question is how news orgs will try to subvert the aggregators.  Keeping in mind, of course, that I want my aggregator.  The goofy MS/NYT reader thingie is a step in the wrong direction &#8211; proprietary.  Some of this depends on just how inexpensive the materials for our e-papers will be.  If the stuff is practically disposable, then you could buy a Times-branded reader one day and a Post-branded reader the next.  Not sure I like the sound of that, but it&#8217;s a possibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

