<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is the future bright? Books, Digitisation and Evil!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s that simple -- and that hard. And that inescapable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 May 2012 15:22:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: eoinpurcell</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eoinpurcell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 10:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that Jarvis is talking about non-fiction by default, or at least what he says only makes sense for non-fiction.
I do hate the extent of copyright and the possible dangers of DRM especially now that it strays so far from the lifespan of the author. It does seem crazy to have books still potected 70+ years after the writer has passed away.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Jarvis is talking about non-fiction by default, or at least what he says only makes sense for non-fiction.<br />
I do hate the extent of copyright and the possible dangers of DRM especially now that it strays so far from the lifespan of the author. It does seem crazy to have books still potected 70+ years after the writer has passed away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: only2rs</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[only2rs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 08:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read this post and your previous post about Jeff Jarvis with interest. As a writer, as well as a reader, this issue is one that has been exercising my mind considerably recently. I am not sure that I am as positive as Jarvis or the previous commenter. In any case Jarvis seemed to be talking about non-fiction rather than fiction. What really concerns me is copyright and the current attempts by media corporations to lock down &#039;content&#039; with all sorts of DRM. That really bothers me because I&#039;m old fashioned enough to believe that the public domain should be the default. Besides I don&#039;t like ebooks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read this post and your previous post about Jeff Jarvis with interest. As a writer, as well as a reader, this issue is one that has been exercising my mind considerably recently. I am not sure that I am as positive as Jarvis or the previous commenter. In any case Jarvis seemed to be talking about non-fiction rather than fiction. What really concerns me is copyright and the current attempts by media corporations to lock down &#8216;content&#8217; with all sorts of DRM. That really bothers me because I&#8217;m old fashioned enough to believe that the public domain should be the default. Besides I don&#8217;t like ebooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Niederer&#8217;s &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will iTunes meld with MySpace!</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Niederer&#8217;s &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will iTunes meld with MySpace!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 May 2006 01:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Enjoyed  Eoin Purcell&#8217;s post &quot;Is the future bright? Books, Digitisation and Evil! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enjoyed  Eoin Purcell&#8217;s post &quot;Is the future bright? Books, Digitisation and Evil! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pubbys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will iTunes meld with MySpace!</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pubbys &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Will iTunes meld with MySpace!]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 23:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Enjoyed  Eoin Purcell&#8217;s post &quot;Is the future bright? Books, Digitisation and Evil! [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enjoyed  Eoin Purcell&#8217;s post &quot;Is the future bright? Books, Digitisation and Evil! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davinci</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[davinci]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 23:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/2006/05/26/is-the-future-bright-books-digitisation-and-evil/#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Enjoyed your post.

I guess there are always pathfinders.

I remember getting my first Mac and laser printer in 1984. Suddenly all those one page brochures and leaflets that were printed by printers via advertising agencies became the domain of people with a Mac. That impact has lasted through to now where a large majority of people in the graphic industry use Macs. This changed a paragdigm. Jobs did it again with iTunes. Back then nobody bitched about postscript being an enabling language, they just used the machines. 

Yes its a different world now but someone had to provide a solution that worked seemlessly for the user. Like the Mac and the laser printer. There are many lasr printers now and lots of programs to use them. MacDraw and MacPaint are no more. Pagemaker is hanging on. iTunes will not be the only format forever but without the paradign shift would I be driving to work listening to a podcast from London about publishing here in Australia? 

While iTunes is talked about being a virtual monopoly MySpace should be seen as more of a threat to publishers. Given that companies like Lulu and Booksurge can produce physical books they can be marketed directly to the world by the author and delived as an eBook or as hard copy. At least publishers are in the game with iTunes but maybe not for long. Most minor bands and artists in the world have MySpace accounts and sell their tracks from there. No record companies involved. Their community of fans visit their MySpace every day to check if anything is new. A whole new paradigm.

So ... yes there are two ways to go but I believe the trend will be that most of the publishing market will go direct from the artist to the consumer with &quot;bestsellers&quot; being picked up by traditional companies who have the bookshops and record stores.

Cheers
Paul Niedderer  pubbys.com

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pubbys.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;pubbys.com&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyed your post.</p>
<p>I guess there are always pathfinders.</p>
<p>I remember getting my first Mac and laser printer in 1984. Suddenly all those one page brochures and leaflets that were printed by printers via advertising agencies became the domain of people with a Mac. That impact has lasted through to now where a large majority of people in the graphic industry use Macs. This changed a paragdigm. Jobs did it again with iTunes. Back then nobody bitched about postscript being an enabling language, they just used the machines. </p>
<p>Yes its a different world now but someone had to provide a solution that worked seemlessly for the user. Like the Mac and the laser printer. There are many lasr printers now and lots of programs to use them. MacDraw and MacPaint are no more. Pagemaker is hanging on. iTunes will not be the only format forever but without the paradign shift would I be driving to work listening to a podcast from London about publishing here in Australia? </p>
<p>While iTunes is talked about being a virtual monopoly MySpace should be seen as more of a threat to publishers. Given that companies like Lulu and Booksurge can produce physical books they can be marketed directly to the world by the author and delived as an eBook or as hard copy. At least publishers are in the game with iTunes but maybe not for long. Most minor bands and artists in the world have MySpace accounts and sell their tracks from there. No record companies involved. Their community of fans visit their MySpace every day to check if anything is new. A whole new paradigm.</p>
<p>So &#8230; yes there are two ways to go but I believe the trend will be that most of the publishing market will go direct from the artist to the consumer with &#8220;bestsellers&#8221; being picked up by traditional companies who have the bookshops and record stores.</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Paul Niedderer  pubbys.com</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pubbys.com" rel="nofollow">pubbys.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

