Links of Interest (At Least to Me) 19/06/06

A rather nice author’s site called anatomy of a book deal, well executed and intriguing.
Here

Because I like Powell’s, because their blog is fun and because I can.
Here

More and more I think Journals will be the first to go online and this is one of the examples I think set so high a standard. From the site:

Democratiya is a free bi-monthly online review of books. Our interests will range over war, peace, just war, and humanitarian interventionism; human rights, genocide, crimes against humanity and the responsibility to protect and rescue; the United Nations, international law and the doctrine of the international community; as well as democratisation, social and labour movements, ‘global civil society’, ‘global social democracy’, and Sennian development-as-freedom.

Get the rest:
Here

The Guardian Brings e-news one step closer

The Guardian is launching a new A4 sized downloadable and printable PDF called G24. There is a Guardian media story here. (You may need to register) From the piece:

The Guardian is launching a new service providing readers with a rapid overview of news that will be updated every 15 minutes.

G24 will be a free service featuring news content from the Guardian Unlimited website across five areas: general news, international, economics, sport and media.

Users will be able to log on to Guardian Unlimited and download an eight to 12-page A4 PDF document, which can then be printed off. They can select any of the five news streams.

It takes to a whole new level the idea of printing a ticket you bought online. But an excellent level. You can see a preview copy Here.

I can see this as the basis for a more important service. This is updatable news and once paper goes electronic and has wireless internet access it will be portable updatable new. The Guardian really is the innovators in news in the new era. I wonder who the Book Publisher Equivalent is?

Update: Jeff Jarvis wonders over two posts about the moves by the Guardian and Times to move into the US and their return to paper.

What the hell is writing for anyway?

What the hell is writing for anyway?
Take this blog for instance. I treat as my thinking pad in many ways. I write what I think and I expect that sometimes I will make mistakes and not be thinking clearly and hope that when that happens others will take the time to engage with me and discuss my shortcomings. I can choose to agree or disagree. Regularly I will change my mind and so I do not mind that this blog presents my latest thoughts first. I have no intention of using the material in print unless someone is very eager to have my thoughts on their pages (Which I doubt). So I have a realistic goal for my writing. I know what I intend to achieve and what I expect, therefore I have no illusions about who or what I am or what I write.

Reality in writing goals on a wider level in the writing/publishing industry would be refreshing. Many writers however seem to think that they have a divine right to publication, which clearly they don’t. Many others seem to believe that the publishing industry is doing them a great injustice when in fact their writing is either non-commercial or just bad.

Writers need to ask themselves why they are writing and realistically assess their abilities. Once they have done that their options become much clearer. If you are writing for yourself and never want to show it to anyone, great, write and lock it up on a hard drive or in notebooks. Society may lose a gifted writer but the purpose was personal so that’s fine.

If you are writing for others then make sure you know the purpose of writing. If it is like my writing when interaction and thinking are the goals then why do you need publication in print? A blog or personal website will surely achieve your goals if they are modest and on a scale such as mine. And what is more if you really want to see your words in print them create a blook yourself and self publish. Costs are low and you will never need to hold a huge stock if you go Print on Demand.

If you are more ambitious then perhaps you do really need to learn how to approach a publisher or an agent. But before you do surely you need to assess the market for the type of writing you do, the number of competitor writers in the area, the type of price books like yours sell for and perhaps even the quality of the writing compared to your own.

It seems to me that authors fall generally into our categories. Those who say they are not writing for money but for the enjoyment/love/art and really mean what they say. Those who say they are not writing for money but for the enjoyment/love/art and really don’t mean what they say. Those who freely acknowledge that they are writing for money/fame/notoriety. Finally there are the bunch of authors who have no idea, not why they are writing, not who they are writing or, not how the industry works, nor what they hope to achieve and are just writing because they think it’s a good idea. Of the bunch I much prefer the first and the third.
The first because they are honest and really do value the writing for its own sake. For them self-publishing is no crime, that just what it takes to get published sometimes. The third because they too are honest and really do just want fame fortune and all that comes with that.

Too many writers occupy the second and last groups. As technology makes publishing easier it will make publishing for all four groups. For the first group that is wonderful news. Blogs for them are great tools. If they also attract an audience that would be a bonus. For the second it will be tough as endless self promotion will no doubt undermine their affection to not caring about the fame/cash/etc. For the third it will be as useful and wonderful a tool as for the first. They can embrace their writing and their self promotion shamelessly and build fame and fortune more easily. For the last group who know nothing about their goals or hopes with writing they will form the bulk of online writing, pointless, unheralded with the odd gem which may well be picked up by some sharp eyed editor and embraced.

In short, the internet will force many authors to ask questions about their writing and why they are writing. That will clarify purpose and enable just perhaps a bit more clarity in this industry, maybe. Alternatively it could result in millions more authors of the fourth kind! In fact when you think of the 47million blogs that technorati.com now follows perhaps it already has.