<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of digital publishing and goldfish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2008/09/26/of-digital-publishing-and-goldfish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2008/09/26/of-digital-publishing-and-goldfish/</link>
	<description>It&#039;s that simple -- and that hard. And that inescapable.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:44:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Oja</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2008/09/26/of-digital-publishing-and-goldfish/#comment-52853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Oja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/?p=815#comment-52853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you talk to readers, most of them will strongly indicate a preference for reading on paper, not on screen. That makes a lot of sense. Paper is very convenient, relatively cheap, durable, etc. Reading on-screen is generally a nuisance.

I believe that digital publishing won&#039;t really take off until we start to think outside of the box, expanding our definition of &quot;a book&quot; and making full use of the power of today&#039;s computers and the Internet.

Digital publications have to offer special features or benefits to overcome the inherent disadvantage of being read on-screen. It&#039;s not enough to just digitize a static page--we have to use the computer to do something special, something that cannot be done on paper.

For examples of what we&#039;re doing along those lines with interactive college computer textbooks and a newly released historical non-fiction book, visit www.mediatechnicscorp.com and www.sixstarsinthewindow.com.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you talk to readers, most of them will strongly indicate a preference for reading on paper, not on screen. That makes a lot of sense. Paper is very convenient, relatively cheap, durable, etc. Reading on-screen is generally a nuisance.</p>
<p>I believe that digital publishing won&#8217;t really take off until we start to think outside of the box, expanding our definition of &#8220;a book&#8221; and making full use of the power of today&#8217;s computers and the Internet.</p>
<p>Digital publications have to offer special features or benefits to overcome the inherent disadvantage of being read on-screen. It&#8217;s not enough to just digitize a static page&#8211;we have to use the computer to do something special, something that cannot be done on paper.</p>
<p>For examples of what we&#8217;re doing along those lines with interactive college computer textbooks and a newly released historical non-fiction book, visit <a href="http://www.mediatechnicscorp.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.mediatechnicscorp.com</a> and <a href="http://www.sixstarsinthewindow.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.sixstarsinthewindow.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mbreau</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2008/09/26/of-digital-publishing-and-goldfish/#comment-52806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mbreau]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 02:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/?p=815#comment-52806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in a MS Publishing program, and we talk about the &#039;digital&#039; future frequently, and I think it was really interesting to hear it from the other side.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in a MS Publishing program, and we talk about the &#8216;digital&#8217; future frequently, and I think it was really interesting to hear it from the other side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teXtes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; édition numérique : ni sexy, ni cool</title>
		<link>http://eoinpurcellsblog.com/2008/09/26/of-digital-publishing-and-goldfish/#comment-52757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[teXtes &#187; Blog Archive &#187; édition numérique : ni sexy, ni cool]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eoinpurcell.wordpress.com/?p=815#comment-52757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] publie habituellement sur le blog The Digitalist, et dont le manifeste a fait pas mal de bruit, est invit&#233;e sur le blog d&#8217;Eoin Purcell. Sara aime secouer les &#233;diteurs&#160;&#160;: &#8220;Sans toujours &#234;tre [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] publie habituellement sur le blog The Digitalist, et dont le manifeste a fait pas mal de bruit, est invit&eacute;e sur le blog d&#8217;Eoin Purcell. Sara aime secouer les &eacute;diteurs&nbsp;&nbsp;: &#8220;Sans toujours &ecirc;tre [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

