New Title Meetings can be hell! (Trust me, I know …)

Eoin Purcell

Eoin's significantly reduced slush pile

Eoin's significantly reduced slush pile


A heavy days meetings
A very long new title meeting on the Friday of the bank holiday meeting is not what I had in mind, but there was much to cover! Some of it good, some bad, some promising! I’m always stressed to hell before these meetings and pretty tired after them, but this time some thoughts bubbled to the surface, that I’m sure I’ve mentioned before, but a little reiteration can’t hurt!

A word (or two) of advice if I may to authors

    1) Always, always, always include you place of birth, your place of current residence and your profession in your submission letter (or your cv). You would be amazed how many times I get asked those three questions at New Title Meetings.

    2) Please think of at least a tag line or snappy descriptions for your book (fiction or non-fiction) when submitting. Yes these are cheesy and might well be over selling the book, but do it, it’ll help your commissioning editor when they pitch the title.

    3) Always include an image in the submission. Commissioning editors don’t care but sales people do!

    4) Know what genre you fit in! Don’t tell me its indefinable, that just means I’ll have a harder time selling it. If you don’t like pigeon holing, draw some obscure comparison, Milton crossed with Thompson, whatever, just don’t claim after centuries of people writing that you are unique, it’s unlikely to be true*!

    5) If your editor accepts digital submissions, send them digitally! I don’t know how often a slice of the text pasted into my proposal has served to showcase the talent of an author (both in fiction and non-fiction) or highlight a key selling point, this is so much easier to do when the text is in a word/rtf or text file!

That’s it! Keep submitting!
Eoin

* You may have lots to offer and be a new, fresh voice, but your work will trod old ground and plough old furrows. That is not to say people will not love it and thank you a million times for writing! Just know your parameters!

Links of Interest (At Least to Me) 21/10/2008

Eoin Purcell

Michael Cairns @ Frankfurt.
Here (slideshare presentation here or below and video here)

Bookbrunch, a developing UK version of Publishers Marketplace and a nice one too. It has some way to go but I’ll wish it well!
Here

Random House are trialing some interesting new tools for consumers through their website rbooks, I’m intrigued!
Here

New York Times launches some APIs, cool!
Here

Relaxing a little,
Eoin

Tad Williams, Online Gaming and the future

Eoin Purcell

Tad Williams’ Otherland is to become a MMORPG*
I read about it on Orbit’s excellent blog:

It sounds, from the interview in particular, as though Otherland the MMORPG will be a highly original take on the online roleplaying concept, one that puts the key element of interactive story-telling right at the heart of the gaming experience. Pre-order those virtual-reality goggles now…

And there is much much more on Tad’s blog:

Seriously, I’m really looking forward to this game, although it’s still probably a year and a half away, at least. (The release date is 2010.) It’s being made by RealU in Singapore, published by dtp entertainment, and it’s a major project. The entire Singapore studio is devoted solely to the game, and they’re approaching eighty employees. More importantly, though, they’re doing a beautiful, fascinating job, not just duplicating or doing a pastiche of the books, but trying to take what is original and interesting in the work and opening it out into an entirely new realm, the MMORPG. Into the virtual world, that is, and what could be more appropriate for OTHERLAND?

I like this
I like it a lot. What is more it makes sense. Where we once had games flowing from books, now we have online games developing. I can think of three worlds off hand that I’d be likely to spend serious time in were they to go virtual:

    Terry Pratchett‘s Discworld
    George RR Martin‘s Ice & Fire universe and
    Steven Erikson‘s Malazan Empire

The book I’m reading now offers some hope too, Patrick Rothfuss’ The Name of the Wind is really excellent and the world is very impressive.

Longer term, more strategic thoughts

Looking at this development a number of queries arise.

There is the cost issue. Based on just the evidence we have from Tad, The entire Singapore studio is devoted solely to the game, and they’re approaching eighty employees., this is going to cost a lot of money. Development costs are high for gaming, Halo 3 for instance cost around $30 million to develop and around the same to market!

No small scale publisher can do that (indeed even the big ones will be hard pressed). That means this is an area where at best publishers will licence further work rather than direct or engage in the action themselves.

Then there is first mover advantage problem. I’d suggest that if current online games can improve and deepen the experience over time then they have a fair chance of retaining players rather than losing them to new entrants. In fact there is a very good article in the New York Times about this point:

Warhammer is no “WOW killer,” which is what many gamers and industry executives seem to be waiting for. With its international player base and dedicated development team at Blizzard Entertainment, World of Warcraft isn’t going anywhere.

But for a lot of online gamers, Warhammer is providing the most significant competition for their leisure hours in many years. It’s about time

New games face two hurdles, one in getting gamers to try them and two in getting them to stay with them once they have tried! neither is insurmountable but are no inconsequential, especially when the entrenched opposition is so good.

The question then becomes what is the potential size of the market, how many new games are likely to make it through development to the market and onto achieving viability? and that is essentially an issue of time and attention. Suppose I like the idea of five worlds to play in online, can I really spread my attention across them? No I can’t. I’m already reaching a point of distraction with social networks and online groups as it is, games would suck too much of my time.

Perhaps future generations will be comfortable spending many of their leisure hours playing online games, but I would suggest that the market is limited to a core of heavy players making the liklihood of many games reaching that sustainability /profit point low.

Where does that leave us?

All told this ads up to a realm that most publishers will avoid because of costs, inexperience in the market and a feeling that the rewards are just too risky. yet the potential benefits are huge and the authors will no doubt be aware of this.

I cannot help but feel that as an industry publishing is watching an opportunity slip by and in reality there is not much we can do to change that except licence others to exploit our content and that of our authors.

I need to think more about this but I’m nearly certain that for the industry, that is not good.
Eoin

*What is a MMORPG
In case you are wondering a MMPORG is a: massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG) is a genre of computer role-playing games (CRPGs) in which a large number of players interact with one another in a virtual world. The term MMORPG was coined by Richard Garriott, the creator of Ultima Online, the game credited with popularizing the genre in 1997 (for more read the rest of the wikipedia entry here).

Book Depository & Google Preview – I like it

Eoin Purcell

Happy Accident
I stumbled across the fact that Book Depository is using google’s preview function (I assume as part of Google Book’s recent API release: read the blog post and visit the API homepage).

It sits just under the front cover picture and jumps the reader down to the lower portion of the page when clicked. It is a nifty UI though I was a bit puzzled about how I could return to the top at first, and given that you would be hoping to make a sale and the buy button is at the top, this might be an issue!

Wider thoughts?
All told it is a very nice feature. As if I needed a new reason to add books to either my to be read or to be bought piles. The best example I’ve stumbed on so far is this one for Bound Together: How Traders, Preachers, Adventurers, and Warriors Shaped Globalization.

On a reader/buyer level this is a sweet use of Google’s systems and data. Looking at it from a broader perspective I’d also find little to worry me. On the one hand no one else is really in a position to supply this kind of feature, expect maybe Amazon (who seem unlikely to do so lest they damage the competitive advantage that their Search inside feature offers them).

On the other hand, it seems like a cop out as a publisher to say that it’s okay for Google to be the only one in a position to do this! We must be letting ourselves down somewhere when we admit that!

Still, nice feature and executed well too.

26th Story interview George Jones of Borders

Eoin Purcell

And some nice thoughts
For me the money quote is this one:

In many cases It would actually be better economically for publishers if they held the inventory and made it quickly accessible to us when we are selling a title than to ship it all in at once and have us hold excessive quantities on the idea that maybe it will sell and then when it doesn’t, we ship it back. Some publishers have started using staged deliveries which are common practice for most retailers in non-book product categories, but it is still not an industry-wide practice for books and is one of the easiest things we could do to increase efficiency quickly.

But there is much more and others will find value in other comments. Go read!
Eoin