In 2006 when I was only starting to think clearly about digital change (and had only been writing a blog for some 4 months) I wrote a post called Authors Will Drive Change, it was part of a short series of articles on what was changing the publishing industry.
The point is that publishing is no longer just about books and even more it is no longer about waiting for a publisher to decide your work is good enough for print. Options abound and as more and more writers realise that they will take advantage of it.
E-books will push this change even more. There is no reason why authors’ royalties should be the same on e-books as they are for paper books and in many ways there is no reason why the authors cannot sell e-books themselves rather than through a publisher. Why should you sell a paper publisher your digital rights when there is no need?
What I didn’t address back then and what has become clearer now, is how established authors will also drive change and in doing so, make a much bigger impact.
The most recent example of this is JA Konrath who writes The Newbies Guide To Publishing blog. He has been posting for some time now about his rather impressive success in selling books via Amazon’s Kindle device:
In short, this market is perfect for a one-person operation.
I’d certainly entertain an offer from a large publisher, if they wanted to buy rights for one of my books. But I’m not going to go out looking for the opportunity. Especially since I’ll make more money in the long run if I keep my rights.
I could even make more money in the short run.
According to my recent royalty statement, my horror novel AFRAID sold about 54,000 copies in all formats, earning me around $27k.
If I released a Jack Kilborn ebook on my own, and it sold like my current ebooks are selling, I’d make $20k in a year.
It’s doubtful I’ll make $17K next year on AFRAID, since it’s no longer getting coop on bookstore shelves. But I’m sure I’d make $20k, or more, on a self-pubbed ebook.
So in two years I can make more money on my own on a self-pubbed ebook than a book released by a major publisher in hardcover, trade paper, paperback, and ebook formats, supported by a tour and advertising.
Unless it’s a big offer, I can’t imagine selling rights to my work ever again…
And There Is More
The IDPF released the figures for February ebook sales. They are pretty stunning. I’ve written elsewhere about my skepticism regarding ebooks and the industry’s obsession with price and a single format, but when one sees figures like this, it is almost understandable that they get excited and distracted by them.
Mike Shatzkin writes about what this seemingly rapid shift towards digital means for the print side of the business and it is an interesting perspective:
If by the end of 2012, 25% of sales for a new book are digital, then about half of new book sales will be made through online purchases if we count the print book sales made through online retailers (mostly Amazon.)
Online print sales can be served through inventory generated on demand. So, if these estimates are right, we are less than three years away from a publisher (or author) being able to reach half the market for a book without inventory risk!
Having half the market reachable without print-run risk or inventory storage; having half the customers connecting with their reading through online paths that make them at least theoretically identifiable; and having a quarter of those customers reading through a medium that enables interactivity will make all the changes we’ve seen so far in trade publishing appear trivial. And if the very perspicacious Carolyn Reidy, her unnamed counterpart, and I are right, that disruption is going to take place before many books now under contract reach their publication date.
Personally I caution about moving from current trends towards future results. I’m unsure if the sales will continue at their current level never mind continue to explode in such an impressive fashion. However, even if we allow that Mike and the trends are half right and we see say 33% or 40% of the market reachable via no-risk required methods by 2012, then the savvy authors like JA Konrath will see little reason to work with a publisher at all. Why, if they don’t require the finance that is one of a publishers strongest assets, would they?
This is not to say that publishers don’t offer more than finance, they do and in abundance, but for some authors, the skillset that publishers offer is affordable and at a more reasonable cut than they currently allow publishers to keep.
In my view, as the market becomes more digitally biased, the greater the risk that lead and mid-list authors see first the advantage of retaining their own digital rights, then later the advantage of retaining all rights and exploiting them for themselves.
The future, for all that it offers great promise to authors and thus they WILL drive change, may not offer such great promise for publishers and certainly not as they currently exist.
Much to get done today!
8 thoughts on “Authors Really Are Driving Change”
For the past four years I’ve been documenting the odd phenomenon of small, independent writers publishing and selling their fiction on the web. In fact, I helped create the small community that now exists online.
I’ve been following your blog for sometime now, Eoin, and I must say – you’re a breath of fresh air in a (largely) old-fashioned industry.
My bet is that writers will be set the pace and the tone in the publishing world of the future. There are a couple of things that are happening that point to this – writers hiring editors, for instance, and publishing online, and selling ebooks for fun, all of which I’ve been seeing over the past 4 years or so.
Writers will certainly be driving change; and my bet is that publishers will soon have to work to serve writers, as opposed to the other way around.
Great post, Eoin, am looking forward to more in the future. =)
I agree with Eli on all points — a great post, and a reminder of the real effect of the internet on the publishing business. It’s not that publishers can now target readers directly, it’s that AUTHORS can do so. Publishers need to figure out why they’re necessary, valuable or useful to authors AND to readers, and exploit those needs.
Great post, Eoin! I also agree with Eli and Mark. The digital revolution has changed the playing field in many arenas, perhaps none so obvious as in publishing. I’d even wager those estimates for digital sales in 2012 are way low. At the rate things are going, there’s still the likelihood of accelerated growth rather than steady. Great time to be an Indie author, especially because they can make, market and sell ebooks at no cost, bypass a publisher, sell an ebook for $1.99, have a decent royalty and a very happy consumer in the reader, plus it’s environmental. Win, win, win, win. Who loses? Oh yeah, traditional publishing. http://ebooksuccess4free.webs.com
Great post. It’s great to see these extraordinary developments being so well documented.
So Eoin seeing as we are onabout publishing how did it all turn out.
You might le me know
Having some technical and time issues, but you could see the basic results here: http://www.theirishstory.com
It’s in its very early stages so be gentle!
With the ondemand technology, options for authors are broadening all the time. Great post. It’s great to see these extraordinary developments being so well documented.